1
Your word
measured
“John compared his haircut to his friend's”
Definitions come from WordNet, a hand-curated dictionary.
examine and note the similarities or differences of
comparar is Spanish for compared, and every measurement below was made on that English word. Definitions come from English WordNet; Open Multilingual WordNet supplies the Spanish headword, not a Spanish definition.
Panels 3, 4 and 5 are computed per model. Switch to see them disagree.
“John compared his haircut to his friend's”
Definitions come from WordNet, a hand-curated dictionary.
This panel splits comparar itself, not compared — a tokenizer does not care what language it is fed. It is the only panel here that does.
This is the tokenizer splitting text, not the model understanding it.
Shade shows how close the model puts each word to compared, 1 of 8 also appear in the dictionary. 1 of 3 dictionary synonyms are in this build; the rest have no vector to compare yet.
Shade shows how close the model puts each word to compared, 1 of 8 also appear in the dictionary. 1 of 3 dictionary synonyms are in this build; the rest have no vector to compare yet.
Shade shows how close the model puts each word to compared, 1 of 8 also appear in the dictionary. 1 of 3 dictionary synonyms are in this build; the rest have no vector to compare yet.
Model neighbours are distributional, not dictionary synonyms. Two words can be close because they appear in similar sentences, which is why an antonym can outscore a synonym here.
Scores are projections onto axes we defined from anchor words, not labels the model assigns.
These sit just outside the closest neighbours in panel 3, and no dictionary lists any of them as related to compared. That gap is the model’s own learned association.
These sit just outside the closest neighbours in panel 3, and no dictionary lists any of them as related to compared. That gap is the model’s own learned association.
These sit just outside the closest neighbours in panel 3, and no dictionary lists any of them as related to compared. That gap is the model’s own learned association.
These are statistical associations in the training data, not the model thinking.