1
Your word
measured
“This approach has been tried with good results”
Definitions come from WordNet, a hand-curated dictionary.
put to the test, as for its quality, or give experimental use to
examinar is Spanish for tested, and every measurement below was made on that English word. Definitions come from English WordNet; Open Multilingual WordNet supplies the Spanish headword, not a Spanish definition.
Panels 3, 4 and 5 are computed per model. Switch to see them disagree.
“This approach has been tried with good results”
Definitions come from WordNet, a hand-curated dictionary.
This panel splits examinar itself, not tested — a tokenizer does not care what language it is fed. It is the only panel here that does.
This is the tokenizer splitting text, not the model understanding it.
Shade shows how close the model puts each word to tested, 1 of 8 also appear in the dictionary. 8 of 12 dictionary synonyms are in this build; the rest have no vector to compare yet.
Shade shows how close the model puts each word to tested, 2 of 8 also appear in the dictionary. 8 of 12 dictionary synonyms are in this build; the rest have no vector to compare yet.
Shade shows how close the model puts each word to tested, 1 of 8 also appear in the dictionary. 8 of 12 dictionary synonyms are in this build; the rest have no vector to compare yet.
Model neighbours are distributional, not dictionary synonyms. Two words can be close because they appear in similar sentences, which is why an antonym can outscore a synonym here.
Scores are projections onto axes we defined from anchor words, not labels the model assigns.
These sit just outside the closest neighbours in panel 3, and no dictionary lists any of them as related to tested. That gap is the model’s own learned association.
These sit just outside the closest neighbours in panel 3, and no dictionary lists any of them as related to tested. That gap is the model’s own learned association.
These sit just outside the closest neighbours in panel 3, and no dictionary lists any of them as related to tested. That gap is the model’s own learned association.
These are statistical associations in the training data, not the model thinking.