Definitions come from WordNet, a hand-curated dictionary.
of or relating to a combinatorial system devised by George Boole that combines propositions with the logical operators AND and OR and IF THEN and EXCEPT and NOT
boolien is French for boolean, and every measurement below was made on that English word. Definitions come from English WordNet; Open Multilingual WordNet supplies the French headword, not a French definition.
Panels 3, 4 and 5 are computed per model. Switch to see them disagree.
Definitions come from WordNet, a hand-curated dictionary.
This panel splits boolien itself, not boolean — a tokenizer does not care what language it is fed. It is the only panel here that does.
This is the tokenizer splitting text, not the model understanding it.
WordNet lists none for this word.
Shade shows how close the model puts each word to boolean.
WordNet lists none for this word.
Shade shows how close the model puts each word to boolean.
WordNet lists none for this word.
Shade shows how close the model puts each word to boolean.
Model neighbours are distributional, not dictionary synonyms. Two words can be close because they appear in similar sentences, which is why an antonym can outscore a synonym here.
Scores are projections onto axes we defined from anchor words, not labels the model assigns.
These sit just outside the closest neighbours in panel 3, and no dictionary lists any of them as related to boolean. That gap is the model’s own learned association.
These sit just outside the closest neighbours in panel 3, and no dictionary lists any of them as related to boolean. That gap is the model’s own learned association.
These sit just outside the closest neighbours in panel 3, and no dictionary lists any of them as related to boolean. That gap is the model’s own learned association.
These are statistical associations in the training data, not the model thinking.