“their son became a famous judge”
Definitions come from WordNet, a hand-curated dictionary.
a male human offspring
fils is French for son, and every measurement below was made on that English word. Definitions come from English WordNet; Open Multilingual WordNet supplies the French headword, not a French definition.
Panels 3, 4 and 5 are computed per model. Switch to see them disagree.
“their son became a famous judge”
Definitions come from WordNet, a hand-curated dictionary.
This panel splits fils itself, not son — a tokenizer does not care what language it is fed. It is the only panel here that does.
This is the tokenizer splitting text, not the model understanding it.
daughter is the dictionary opposite of son, yet this model puts it closer than every one of the 3 synonyms it can score. Opposites share the sentences a word lives in, so cosine alone cannot tell them apart - which is why the dictionary seeds this list rather than the geometry.
Shade shows how close the model puts each word to son.
daughter is the dictionary opposite of son, yet this model puts it closer than every one of the 3 synonyms it can score. Opposites share the sentences a word lives in, so cosine alone cannot tell them apart - which is why the dictionary seeds this list rather than the geometry.
Shade shows how close the model puts each word to son.
daughter is the dictionary opposite of son, yet this model puts it closer than every one of the 3 synonyms it can score. Opposites share the sentences a word lives in, so cosine alone cannot tell them apart - which is why the dictionary seeds this list rather than the geometry.
Shade shows how close the model puts each word to son.
Model neighbours are distributional, not dictionary synonyms. Two words can be close because they appear in similar sentences, which is why an antonym can outscore a synonym here.
Scores are projections onto axes we defined from anchor words, not labels the model assigns.
These sit just outside the closest neighbours in panel 3, and no dictionary lists any of them as related to son. That gap is the model’s own learned association.
These sit just outside the closest neighbours in panel 3, and no dictionary lists any of them as related to son. That gap is the model’s own learned association.
These sit just outside the closest neighbours in panel 3, and no dictionary lists any of them as related to son. That gap is the model’s own learned association.
These are statistical associations in the training data, not the model thinking.