1
Your word
measured
“a stochastic variable”
Definitions come from WordNet, a hand-curated dictionary.
being or having a random variable
stochastique is French for stochastic, and every measurement below was made on that English word. Definitions come from English WordNet; Open Multilingual WordNet supplies the French headword, not a French definition.
Panels 3, 4 and 5 are computed per model. Switch to see them disagree.
“a stochastic variable”
Definitions come from WordNet, a hand-curated dictionary.
This panel splits stochastique itself, not stochastic — a tokenizer does not care what language it is fed. It is the only panel here that does.
This is the tokenizer splitting text, not the model understanding it.
WordNet lists none for this word.
Shade shows how close the model puts each word to stochastic.
WordNet lists none for this word.
Shade shows how close the model puts each word to stochastic.
This model splits stochastic into 3 pieces, so it has no vector of its own here: this is the average of its fragments, and the results below are correspondingly rough.
WordNet lists none for this word.
Shade shows how close the model puts each word to stochastic.
Model neighbours are distributional, not dictionary synonyms. Two words can be close because they appear in similar sentences, which is why an antonym can outscore a synonym here.
This model splits stochastic into 3 pieces, so it has no vector of its own here: this is the average of its fragments, and the results below are correspondingly rough.
Scores are projections onto axes we defined from anchor words, not labels the model assigns.
These sit just outside the closest neighbours in panel 3, and no dictionary lists any of them as related to stochastic. That gap is the model’s own learned association.
These sit just outside the closest neighbours in panel 3, and no dictionary lists any of them as related to stochastic. That gap is the model’s own learned association.
This model splits stochastic into 3 pieces, so it has no vector of its own here: this is the average of its fragments, and the results below are correspondingly rough.
These sit just outside the closest neighbours in panel 3, and no dictionary lists any of them as related to stochastic. That gap is the model’s own learned association.
These are statistical associations in the training data, not the model thinking.