Definitions come from WordNet, a hand-curated dictionary.
do one's shopping at; do business with; be a customer or client of
顧客となる is Japanese for frequent, and every measurement below was made on that English word. Definitions come from English WordNet; Open Multilingual WordNet supplies the Japanese headword, not a Japanese definition.
Panels 3, 4 and 5 are computed per model. Switch to see them disagree.
Definitions come from WordNet, a hand-curated dictionary.
3 of those are a raw byte rather than a character: Mistral 7B splits this word below the character, so no single token it sees is readable.
This panel splits 顧客となる itself, not frequent — a tokenizer does not care what language it is fed. It is the only panel here that does.
This is the tokenizer splitting text, not the model understanding it.
boycott is the dictionary opposite of frequent, yet this model puts it closer than every one of the 2 synonyms it can score. Opposites share the sentences a word lives in, so cosine alone cannot tell them apart - which is why the dictionary seeds this list rather than the geometry.
Shade shows how close the model puts each word to frequent. 2 of 7 dictionary synonyms are in this build; the rest have no vector to compare yet.
boycott is the dictionary opposite of frequent, yet this model puts it closer than 1 of the 2 synonyms it can score. Opposites share the sentences a word lives in, so cosine alone cannot tell them apart - which is why the dictionary seeds this list rather than the geometry.
Shade shows how close the model puts each word to frequent. 2 of 7 dictionary synonyms are in this build; the rest have no vector to compare yet.
Shade shows how close the model puts each word to frequent. 2 of 7 dictionary synonyms are in this build; the rest have no vector to compare yet.
Model neighbours are distributional, not dictionary synonyms. Two words can be close because they appear in similar sentences, which is why an antonym can outscore a synonym here.
Scores are projections onto axes we defined from anchor words, not labels the model assigns.
These sit just outside the closest neighbours in panel 3, and no dictionary lists any of them as related to frequent. That gap is the model’s own learned association.
These sit just outside the closest neighbours in panel 3, and no dictionary lists any of them as related to frequent. That gap is the model’s own learned association.
These sit just outside the closest neighbours in panel 3, and no dictionary lists any of them as related to frequent. That gap is the model’s own learned association.
These are statistical associations in the training data, not the model thinking.