“an obscure turn of phrase”
Definitions come from WordNet, a hand-curated dictionary.
not clearly understood or expressed; ; -Anatole Broyard; - P.A.Sorokin; - John Locke
Panels 3, 4 and 5 are computed per model. Switch to see them disagree.
“an obscure turn of phrase”
Definitions come from WordNet, a hand-curated dictionary.
This is the tokenizer splitting text, not the model understanding it.
defined is the dictionary opposite of vague, yet this model puts it closer than 1 of the 4 synonyms it can score. Opposites share the sentences a word lives in, so cosine alone cannot tell them apart - which is why the dictionary seeds this list rather than the geometry.
Shade shows how close the model puts each word to vague, 1 of 8 also appear in the dictionary. 4 of 6 dictionary synonyms are in this build; the rest have no vector to compare yet.
Shade shows how close the model puts each word to vague, 2 of 8 also appear in the dictionary. 4 of 6 dictionary synonyms are in this build; the rest have no vector to compare yet.
Shade shows how close the model puts each word to vague. 4 of 6 dictionary synonyms are in this build; the rest have no vector to compare yet.
Model neighbours are distributional, not dictionary synonyms. Two words can be close because they appear in similar sentences, which is why an antonym can outscore a synonym here.
Scores are projections onto axes we defined from anchor words, not labels the model assigns.
These sit just outside the closest neighbours in panel 3, and no dictionary lists any of them as related to vague. That gap is the model’s own learned association.
These sit just outside the closest neighbours in panel 3, and no dictionary lists any of them as related to vague. That gap is the model’s own learned association.
These sit just outside the closest neighbours in panel 3, and no dictionary lists any of them as related to vague. That gap is the model’s own learned association.
These are statistical associations in the training data, not the model thinking.