1
Your word
measured
“He replaced the old razor blade”
Definitions come from WordNet, a hand-curated dictionary.
substitute a person or thing for (another that is broken or inefficient or lost or no longer working or yielding what is expected)
更换 is Chinese for replace, and every measurement below was made on that English word. Definitions come from English WordNet; Open Multilingual WordNet supplies the Chinese headword, not a Chinese definition.
Panels 3, 4 and 5 are computed per model. Switch to see them disagree.
“He replaced the old razor blade”
Definitions come from WordNet, a hand-curated dictionary.
This panel splits 更换 itself, not replace — a tokenizer does not care what language it is fed. It is the only panel here that does.
This is the tokenizer splitting text, not the model understanding it.
Shade shows how close the model puts each word to replace. 3 of 8 dictionary synonyms are in this build; the rest have no vector to compare yet.
Shade shows how close the model puts each word to replace, 1 of 8 also appear in the dictionary. 3 of 8 dictionary synonyms are in this build; the rest have no vector to compare yet.
Shade shows how close the model puts each word to replace, 1 of 8 also appear in the dictionary. 3 of 8 dictionary synonyms are in this build; the rest have no vector to compare yet.
Model neighbours are distributional, not dictionary synonyms. Two words can be close because they appear in similar sentences, which is why an antonym can outscore a synonym here.
Scores are projections onto axes we defined from anchor words, not labels the model assigns.
These sit just outside the closest neighbours in panel 3, and no dictionary lists any of them as related to replace. That gap is the model’s own learned association.
These sit just outside the closest neighbours in panel 3, and no dictionary lists any of them as related to replace. That gap is the model’s own learned association.
These sit just outside the closest neighbours in panel 3, and no dictionary lists any of them as related to replace. That gap is the model’s own learned association.
These are statistical associations in the training data, not the model thinking.